Known Danish law office suspected of receiving return commission of large Danish bank
For alarm and warning that’s how the Danish banks do business.
Do The Board of Directors works in all the major Danish banks, as the Manager Jyske Bank. CEO Anders Dam.
Make no mistake, the case could be used Teaching use, education Movie Crime novel Documentary, in the combination with the plaintiff’s life story.
–
Regarding whether Jyske Bank has bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, in the form of a return commission.
For this reason, through a collaboration between Jyske Bank and Lundgrens, not to present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank.
The Chase is like thes documents, last 11-08-2019 directly to the members of Lundgrens.
/
Then it is a FACT
First
Lundgrens gets our case against Jyske Bank on February 5, 2018.
2nd
Lundgrens enters
Third
Lundgrens check the website www.BANKNYT.dk April 16, 2018.
4th
Lundgrens then enters into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank.
5th
Just as it is the FACT that Lundgrens will be kicked out on 25 September 2019 for the period 5 February to Lundgrens.
At least 30 times have been informed of the allegations.
And have been given direct INSTRUCTION, to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, without following any of the client’s instructions.
🙁
It should be investigated by the police whether Lundgren’s lawyers have been bribed / paid by Jyske Bank A / S
And who at Jyske Bank has approved contacting Lundgren’s lawyers around March May 2018, to advise Jyske Bank on a transaction for around DKK 600 million.
Just as a study on Jyske Bank has given Lundgren’s other tasks, and which.
Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens has not wanted to answer the client’s questions, about the cooperation between the parties Lundgrens and Jyske Bank.
/
If Lundgren’s lawyers are a reputable law firm.
Then the management of Lundgren himself contacts the police and asks them to investigate Lundgrens
The suspicion that some of the partners have been dishonest towards their customer / small client ..
The Chase the Lundgrens deliver to the court 02-09-2019, is these documents. And is not the same, as the offer for the Fraud deliver to Lundgrens 11-08-2019 and many times before.
The letter is just one of many, in which we repeatedly ask, Lundgren’s lawyers, such as the clerk Emil and Mette-Marie and Dan Terkildsen, to present the client’s, ie our fraud allegations against Jyske Bank.
We refer to the SMSs in the letter, with allegations sent to Emil, but which none of Lundgren’s attorneys would provide.
In the letter, the client refers to SMS 23-08-2019. and writes that Emil from Lundgrens has not responded to their client’s SMS / And also refers to Mette-Marie in Lundgrens. Which in turn raised our allegations 10-12-2018, to present the client’s claims to the court 18-12-2018. –
IT IS A FACT.
That Mette-Marie chooses with Dan Terkildsen, not to submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank, in the closing petition 18-12-2018 There Mette-Marie is doing the same thing on December 18 and will be sent to court.
I IT IS S A FACT
That Lundgren’s attorneys 02/09/2019 make and present litigation 2, exactly 4 weeks before the scheduled hearing 30 September In this document, Lundgrens also did not include any of the client’s fraud claims.
Just as it is a fact that Emil does not share Process Letter 2 with the client who first gets a copy, after Lundgrens has been fired, on suspicion that Lundgren’s lawyers are corrupt. –
The main claim is still Appendix 1. a change of interest from 16-07-2008 of DKK 4,328,000. for an underlying loan that does NOT exist.
That Annex 1 is false is said 1,000 times. Just this little detail, Lundgren’s lawyers fail to present to the court. / IT IS A FACT That Lundgrens, by Dan Terkildsen, Mette-Marie and Emil, repeatedly stated that the SWAPPEN of 16-07-2008 Appendix 1. by the client is alleged to be false. When Lundgren’s attorneys present the case, as if Appendix 1. is agreed and approved. Then, directly directly against the client’s instructions, bring the case as a case of bad advice, against the client’s claims.
Then it must be Lundgrens and Jyske Bank who must have agreed this. – And why doesn’t Lundgrens send the client a copy of litigation 2. Clear that the client thinks that Jyske Bank must have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, in order not to present the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank Whether it is Bribery that happened by the Return Commission, or in a fee, hidden in some way, the parties to Lundgren’s lawyers must be able to explain. Like when Jyske Bank hires Lundgrens for a large million tasks.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW IF LUNDGREN’S ADVOCATES HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED? SO YOU MUST ASK LUNDGRENS LAWYER’S AND JYSKE BANK’S MANAGEMENT
Can you see something is missing, is Fraud and False notes in the documents. Date 02-09-2019
/
This is an invitation to Lundgrens and Jyske Bank.
Now ask the police to investigate
About Jyske Bank bribing Lundgrens to counteract their client’s case against Jyske Bank and the management.
To directly contribute to fraud allegations against Jyske Bank has not been presented.
Why the Client Himself Has to Present, the 52-page Final Petition, October 28, 2019
The Chase the Lundgrens do not delivered to the court, so the victim them self, had to deliver the proff of Fraud to the court. 28-10-2019, her is a little bit of it.
When Lundgren’s lawyers have been instructed several times to present the client’s fraud allegations.
/
We do not need to ask the management of Jyske Bank to ask the police to investigate Jyske Bank, because the bank has bribed Lundgrens, by using the return commission.
Since Jyske Bank has already lied to the court through their board member and lawyer Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, already, several places in legal matters.
🙂
Like Jyske Bank, the customer who is exposed to the bank’s long-standing fraud wants an early decision.
But Philip Baruch, we were just bombed back to September 25, 2019, after we discovered that Jyske Bank probably bought our lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers in April 2018.
So it’s not conspiracy theories, as Lundgrens thinks it is, but simply one FACT
Welkom in the Danish Banks.
To those who trust that Denmark is not a corrupt country, Arsk Lundgrens and Lund Elmer Sandager lawyer and Jyske bank about it.
The question is more how many people in Denmark use bribery or corruption to achieve something, like here to keep a case of millions fraud out of court.
Only after 44 months of continuous work, probably 3,000 hours of work, do we succeed in getting our claims against Jyske Bank presented to the court
As we only after, we ourselves have made sure to present the client’s fraud claim against Jyske Bank, in the Danish courts.
Then our new lawyer takes over and makes the new allegation, with a whole lot of new allegations.
What we have asked for presented since 2016.
So not new allegations, but just a whole lot of allegations that our now fired lawyer Lundgren’s lawyers refused to submit, as their cooperation with Jyske Bank did not allow a fraud case
Against the same Jyske Bank.
🙂
Then we got a new lawyer on the case, and looked at the annexes.
A customer of Jyske Bank does not understand why Anders Christian Dam will not just meet.
–
–
A customer of the Danish fraud bank, in connection with the firing of their lawyers Lundgrens, for apparently having received a bribe from Jyske Bank.
Maybe directly by CEO Anders Dam for not presenting the client’s fraud allegations to Jyske Bank A / S.
The Danish courts have announced this is why Lundgren’s lawyers are retiring.
In Danish, has been fired.
–
Which Jyske Bank Board member Philip Baruch, by Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater has rejected should have happened.
/
Lundgren’s lawyers have commented that these disqualification issues are purely conspiracy theories, and have nothing on them.
Whether Lundgren’s lawyers at Dan Terkildsen himself should be called as a witness.
And the court can explain why Lundgren’s lawyers have not presented the client’s allegations against Jyske Bank for fraud and fraud, while Lundgren’s lawyers.
Presumably by Jyske Bank has been given Lundgrens around 15-20 million Danish kroner to give Jyske Bank advice.
Which could provide a better illumination of Lundgren’s moving grounds, to thwart their small client.
Who now for a third time must have a new lawyer.
/
Since Jyske Bank has strongly distanced itself from possibly having used a return commission, or a bribe in the case, in order that the applicant’s claims against Jyske Bank should not be presented i court.
The plaintiff has therefore just 1. November submitted an Appendix 168. Becomes 168.A in the case op
The annex is from Lundgren’s website, where they write that Lundgrens has advised Jyske Bank, in a transaction for a three-digit million amount, in Danish kroner.
“More precisely about 600 million Danish kroner.”
/
After the fraudulent exposed client in Jyske Bank has met with their new lawyer.
And that has gone through the case, and is confirmed in the fact that these are not conspiracy theories, but that they are facts.
The client tells their new lawyer that they are actually satisfied that Jyske Bank is convicted of fraud and forgery false.
Following the allegations which the plaintiff himself had to make in the closing plea, which Lundgrens was certainly paid not to present.
–
Clearly, the plaintiff would have included the seriousness of Jyske Bank, in all likelihood, bribing the plaintiff’s lawyer, not to present the client’s fraud allegations against the defendant danish bank Jyske Bank.
/
Prosecutions directed directly at the bank’s overall Board of Directors to stand together in association with, the Jyske Bank Group’s continued and very serious failure business against the bank’s customer.
/
The plaintiff also states that in three submitted letters from 2018, the group management is all offered that they could actually discharge their mandate.
Know that the board members who chose to sign
Jyske Bank has been exposed to fraud for a number of years and will no longer be contributing to Jyske Bank causing fraud, the members could sign and return the letter to the applicant.
–
By signing, the members of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors could be exempt from liability.
It is stated that not a single member of Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors / Group Management has wanted to stop the fraud against the bank’s customer.
/
That with the inner circle in Jyske Bank by CEO Anders Christian Dam, seems to have paid Lundgren’s lawyers, through the use of a return commission.
The applicant’s allegations against Jyske Bank appear to be corroborated only as true charges.
–
When Jyske Bank is ready to lie in the court itself, by Lund Elmer Sandager and in this case has lied to the court, to want to disappoint in legal matters, and then to continue deceive the bank’s customer.
/
/
CEO
Anders Christian Dam
CALL NOW
0045 22227713
This is a continuing hand, which since May 2016 has been hould out against Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors.
And most be especially clear to you Anders Dam.
–
If you have found something that does not fit, then let’s meet and review the evidence, tell us which places Jyske Bank disagrees with the dokumation.
If there is anything about Jyske bank and the management says that is untrue?
Should we then not meet, and at the same time get the places that have been written accusations against Jyske Bank if there is no team in any of the accusations.
–
This small matter, Jyske Bank’s foundation emphasizes, and running a fair banking business is not part of the board’s wishes.
If we are wrong, we ask the Jyske Bank Group Management for dialogue.
Anders Dam old boy, call now at +45 22227713
And let’s meet, we’re a little tired of one-way communication, after all, it takes 2 to have a dialogue.
/
/
The applicant states that they would still like to receive the court’s offer of litigation.
Which Jyske Bank has shown no desire.
/
That the plaintiff has repeatedly asked the management of the continuing fraud to meet, no one can doubt, therefore we would like to repeat
Jyske Bank is welcome
Just call.
Show that Jyske Bank is an open and reputable bank
Show that Jyske Bank is a fair and honest bank.
IT SHOULD NOT BE SO DIFFICULT.
/
/
In Denmark it is David against Goliath
Thus, the largest Danish banks do business.
And all customers are as vulnerable as we are, the question is just who will be the next victim of Danish bank fraud.
Remember this here is all our thoughts in an open diary.
/
/
The plaintiff’s new attorney has obtained a copy of the closing plea of August 28, 2019.
The plaintiff, who is poor at writing, and probably also slightly dyslexic, has stated that there are some typos and corrects these errors to the best of his ability.
But as a starting point, the lawsuit contains the allegations that Rødstenen’s lawyers and Lundgren’s lawyers have countered were presented.
Whether Lundgren’s lawyers saw Jyske Bank’s Group Management been honored for helping Jyske Bank keep the fraud case out of court by continuing a case of bad advice.
You can think about for a bit of time.
/
Jyske Bank can be contacted here +45 89898989
the company
Storbjerg Business
Soevej 5.
3100. Hornbaek
Denmark
Phone 0045 22227713
/
When it comes to Danish banks, it’s about cheating their customers as much as possible, and banks like Jyske Bank go so far as to expose customers to fraud.
Then it is only a moment before some customer finds evidence that the Danish bank Jyske Bank is going really far for their shareholders.
We can mention here a few of them, Nykredit, Codan, ATP.
Atp’s board of directors does not mind Jyske bank exposing customers to fraud, and will not interfere.
/
Falou the small players fight against the evael big danish bank Jyske Bank at www Banknyt dk
/
You fraud case want to meet you Anders Dam, at have a little talking with you and your company.
this is just a little search word
#JYSKE BANK BLEV OPDAGET / TAGET I AT LAVE
#MANDATSVIG
#BEDRAGERI
#DOKUMENTFALSK
#UDNYTTELSE
#SVIG
#FALSK
#Bank #AndersChristianDam
#Financial #News #Press #Share #Pol #Recommendation #Sale #Firesale #AndersDam #JyskeBank #ATP #PFA #MortenUlrikGade #PhilipBaruch #LES #BirgitBushThuesen #LundElmerSandager #Nykredit #MetteEgholmNielsen #Loan #Fraud #CasperDamOlsen #NicolaiHansen #AnetteKirkeby #SørenWoergaaed
#Gangcrimes #Crimes
#Koncernledelse #jyskebank
#Koncernbestyrelsen #SvenBuhrkall #KurtBligaardPedersen #RinaAsmussen #PhilipBaruch #JensABorup #KeldNorup #ChristinaLykkeMunk #HaggaiKunisch #MarianneLillevang #Koncerndirektionen #AndersDam #LeifFLarsen #NielsErikJakobsen #PerSkovhus #PeterSchleidt
Lundgrens Niels Gram- Hanssen, Pedram Moghaddam, Dan Terkildsen, Tobias Vieth og Thomas Stampe, flytter til nyt kontor.