J

エスカレーション中のデンマークでおそらく最大の銀行スキャンダル。 顧客自身による調査中の新しいデンマークの銀行のスキャンダル、他の弁護士や銀行は小さな問題をカバーしています。 そして今回は、デンマークの銀行で既に知られているマネーロンダリングに関するものではありません。 今回は、デンマークの2番目に大きな銀行であるJyske Bankにとって、偽りの詐欺問題です。 この場合、デンマークの弁護士Lundgrensは深く関わっています。クライアントの詐欺とJyske銀行に対する虚偽の申し立ては、クライアント自身が10月に裁判所に証拠と申し立てを提出しなければならない前に、裁判所に提出されていません。 28。 そして、Jyske Bankの小口顧客に対する詐欺は、11年間の詐欺の後、まだ止められていません。 Lundgrensは、私たちの申し立てについて何を考えているのか、そしてJyske銀行に対する詐欺追跡についての証拠は何ですか。 Dan Terkildsenは8月13日、Jyske Bankの取締役会は何の罪もないと述べた。 Lundgrensは、私たちの主張について1つもコメントしていません。 ?それは非常に奇妙です? なぜ ?。 1か月前、Lundgrensで発見された後、Jyske銀行で働いており、少なくとも2018年4月以来、被告Jyskebankで働いています そして、ダン・テルケルセンはクライアントに、Lundgrensが彼らの弁護士であると信じさせましたが、同時に、Lundgrenの弁護士もJyske Bankで働くために100万の報酬を受け取りました。 Jyske銀行は、Lundgrensを買収して、Jyske銀行に対するクライアントの請求を提出せずに、裁判に敗訴し、裁判に敗訴した可能性が最も高いようです。 グループ管理CEOのAnders Damに、私たちがだまされたくないことを伝えたいですか。 Anders Christian Dam大統領と会うだけで、大人が一緒に話をしたいのですが、これは公正な銀行業務を行う方法ではありません。 そして、私たちは虚偽を書くことに興味はありません。 法廷での問題は、私たちが正しいかどうかであり、私たちが正しいことを証明できるということです。 Lundgrensの意味?あなたは私たちにそれを言ったことはありません。 更新については、Facebook、Twitterにコメントを残してください。 osに電話してください +45 22 22 77 13さらに情報が必要な場合。 banknytで詳細を見る リンクwww.BANKNYT.dk チェイスBS-402 / 2015-VIB これは、2016年5月にJyske銀行の取締役会全体に最初に書いたときのように、単なる対話の呼びかけです。 よろしく Storbjerg Business スベージ5 3100ホーンベク
Esukarēshon-chū no denmāku de osoraku saidai no ginkō sukyandaru. Kokyaku jishin ni yoru chōsa-chū no atarashī denmāku no ginkō no sukyandaru, hoka no bengoshi ya ginkō wa chīsana mondai o kabā shite imasu. Soshite konkai wa, denmāku no ginkō de sudeni shira rete iru manērondaringu ni kansuru monode wa arimasen. Konkai wa, denmāku no 2-banme ni ōkina ginkōdearu Jyske Bank ni totte, itsuwari no sagi mondaidesu. Ko no baai, denmāku no bengoshi Lundgrens wa fukaku kakawatte imasu. Kuraianto no sagi to Jyske ginkō ni taisuru kyogi no mōshitate wa, kuraianto jishin ga 10 tsuki ni saibansho ni shōko to mōshitate o teishutsu shinakereba naranai mae ni, saibansho ni teishutsu sa rete imasen. 28. Soshite, Jyske Bank no koguchi kokyaku ni taisuru sagi wa, 11-nenkan no sagi no ato, mada tome rarete imasen. Lundgrens wa, watashitachi no mōshitate ni tsuite nani o kangaete iru no ka, soshite Jyske ginkō ni taisuru sagi tsuiseki ni tsuite no shōko wa nanidesu ka. Dan Terkildsen wa 8 tsuki 13-nichi, Jyske Bank no torishimariyakkai wa nani no tsumi mo nai to nobeta. Lundgrens wa, watashitachi no shuchō ni tsuite 1tsu mo komento shite imasen. ? Sore wa hijō ni kimyōdesu? Naze? . 1-Kagetsu mae, Lundgrens de hakken sa reta nochi, Jyske ginkō de hataraite ori, sukunakutomo 2018-nen 4 tsuki irai, hikoku Jyskebank de hataraite imasu soshite, dan terukerusen wa kuraianto ni, Lundgrens ga karera no bengoshidearu to shinji sasemashitaga, dōjini, Lundgren no bengoshi mo Jyske Bank de hataraku tame ni 100 man no hōshū o uketorimashita. Jyske ginkō wa, Lundgrens o baishū shite, Jyske ginkō ni taisuru kuraianto no seikyū o teishutsu sezu ni, saiban ni haiso shi, saiban ni haiso shita kanōsei ga mottomo takai yōdesu. Gurūpu kanri CEO no Anders Dam ni, watashitachi ga damasa retakunai koto o tsutaetaidesu ka. Anders kurisuchan Dam daitōryō to au dake de, otona ga issho ni hanashi o shitai nodesuga, kore wa kōseina ginkō gyōmu o okonau hōhōde wa arimasen. Soshite, watashitachiha kyogi o kaku koto ni kyōmi wa arimasen. Hōtei de no mondai wa, watashitachi ga tadashī ka dō kadeari, watashitachi ga tadashī koto o shōmei dekiru to iu kotodesu. Lundgrens no imi? Anata wa watashitachi ni sore o itta koto wa arimasen. Kōshin ni tsuite wa, feisubukku, tsuittā ni komento o nokoshite kudasai. Os ni denwa shite kudasai + 45 22 22 77 13 sarani jōhō ga hitsuyōna baai. Banknyt de shōsai o miru rinku www. BANKNYT. Dk cheisu BS – 402/ 2015 – VIB koreha, 2016-nen 5 tsuki ni Jyske ginkō no torishimariyakkai zentai ni saisho ni kaita toki no yō ni, tan’naru taiwa no yobikakedesu. Yoroshiku Storbjerg Business subēji 5 3100 hōnbeku
Se Sms Emil Lundgrens at www.banknyt.dk

as you can see in the shared SMS between the plaintiff’s lawyer Emil, a student.

Then it must be clear that Lundgren’s lawyers work for the danish bank Jyske bank, and therefore have their own agenda for what Lundgrens plans to present to the court.

Lundgren’s lawyers never answer or confirm their client’s questions.

As you can see in the SMS, sent to Emil from Lundgrens, the client clearly asks their lawyers to submit the client’s claims against Jyske Bank for fraud and forgery.

But it must also be very clear, that Lundgren’s lawyers are not only incapable of carrying out the client’s instructions.

Lundgren’s lawyers directly oppose their own client, in having their case presented to the court.

Here are just a few text messages, but the same applies to Mails and Letters to Lundgren’s lawyers.

Whether it is Mette-Marie or Partner Dan Terkildsen himself, a several letters have already been shared to Lundgren’s lawyers, in which it is not possible to misunderstand the client.

Still, the client’s lawyers are opposing.
law firm Lundgrens deliberately their own client.

Why the case against Jyske Bank for million fraud, also can be about bribery.

For example, Jyske Bank,? by CEO Anders Dam, has contacted Lundgren’s lawyers, using a return commission, for Lundgren’s lawyers to go against their own client.

This clearly seemed to be in the case

It’s fact
That Lundgrens be given the evidence on February 5, 2018.

That Lundgrens is browsing www.banknyt.dk through April 16

That Lundgren’s lawyers for the next 2 months advise Jyske bank on a real estate transaction, for over half a billion Danish kroner.

That Lundgren’s lawyers since have counteracted, that the client should not have their claims against Jyske Bank and the management presented in court.

/

Which is what, filed by Emil before the court on September 2, 2019

In conjunction with these text messages to Emil from Lundgren’s supports.

It only becomes clearer that you can see all the letters and emails to Mette-Marie and Dan Terkildsen.

So if Lundgren’s lawyers do not believe they have received bribery from the management of JYSKE BANK

What the hell, does Lundgren’s lawyers call the return commission.

But Lundgren’s lawyers at their partner Dan Terkildsen can explain to the court themselves, under witness responsibility, why Lundgren’s direct opposition to their client in getting their claims presented.

And, on October 28, they themselves had to submit their closing petition when, after all, they wanted their own lawyer to submit it.

It is Fakum that Lundgren’s lawyers March 22, even lying when they say Appendices 28 – 101 are included in court

The fact is that Lundgren’s already knew that the court would disregard these documents as presented to the court January 8th. 2019

This is what Lundgren’s lawyers do not think their clients should know.

That Lundgrens also does not share Jyske bank’s Process Writings can only be, to keep the client out of the case.

/

som du kan se på de delte SMS mellem sagsøgerens advokat Emil, en elev.

Så må det stå klart at Lundgrens advokater arbejder for Jyske bank, og derfor har deres egen agenda for hvad Lundgrens har planer om at fremlægge retten.

Lundgrens advokater svare eller bekræfter aldrig deres klintens spørgsmål.

Som du kan se i fremsendte SMS til Emil fra Lundgrens, beder klienten klart deres advokater, om at fremlægge klientens påstande mod Jyske Bank for svig og forfalskning.

Men det må også stå meget klart at Lundgrens advokater, ikke kun er inhabile til at varetage klientens instrukser.

Lundgrens advokater direkte modarbejder deres egen klient, i at få deres sag fremlagt for retten.

Her er der bare et par SMS, men det samme gør sig gældende på Mails og Breve til Lundgrens advokater.

Om det er Mette-Marie eller Partner Dan Terkildsen, der er allerede nu delt flere breve til Lundgrens advokater, hvori det ikke er muligt at misforstå klienten.

Alligevel modarbejder klientens advokater.
advokatpartnerselskab Lundgrens bevidst deres egen klien.

Hvorfor sagen mod Jyske Bank for million svig, også kan handle om bestikkelse.

For har Jyske Bank ved CEO Anders Dam, sev bestukket Lundgrens advokater, ved brug af returkommission, for at Lundgrens advokater har gået mod deres egen klient.

Det er Faktum
At Lundgrens får overbragt sagens beviser 5. februar 2018.

At Lundgrens kikker www.banknyt.dk igennem 16. april

At Lundgrens advokater i den for de næste 2 måneder rådgiver Jyske bank med en ejendomshandel, til over en halv milliard danske kroner.

At Lundgrens advokater siden har modarbejdet at klienten, ikke måtte få deres påstande mod Jyske Bank og ledelsen fremlagt.

/

Hvilke det, af Emil for retten fremlagte processkrift 2. september 2019

Sammenholdt med de her Sms’er til Emil fra Lundgrens understøtter.

Det bliver kun tydeligere af at du ser alle breve og mails til Mette-Marie og Dan Terkildsen.

Så hvis Lundgrens advokater ikke selv mener de har taget imod bestikkelse fra ledelsen i JYSKE BANK

Hvad fanden kalder Lundgrens advokater så returkommission for.

Men Lundgrens advokater ved deres Partner Dan Terkildsen kan jo selv forklare over for retten, under vidneansvar hvorfor Lundgrens direkte modarbejdede deres klient i at få deres påstande fremlagt.

Og 28. oktober selv har måtte fremlægge deres afsluttende processkrift, når de jo ville have deres egen advokat fremlagde det.

Det er Faktum at Lundgrens advokater 22 marts, selv lyver, når de siger Bilag 28 – 101 er medtaget i retten

Faktum er det viste Lundgrens allerede 8. januar, hvor retten oplysninger Lundgrens at retten vil se bort fra vores fremlagte bilag, 28 og 29 december 2018.

Dette synes Lundgrens advokater ikke deres klienter skal vide.

At Lundgrens heller ikke deler Jyske banks Processkrifter kan kun være for at holde klienten ude af sagen.
Known Danish law office suspected of receiving return commission of large Danish bank - Regarding whether Jyske Bank has bribed Lundgren's lawyers, in the form of a return commission. For this reason, through a collaboration between Jyske Bank and Lundgrens, not to present the client's claims against Jyske Bank. / Then it is a FACT First Lundgrens gets our case against Jyske Bank on February 5, 2018. 2nd Lundgrens enters Third Lundgrens check the website www.BANKNYT.dk April 16, 2018. 4th Lundgrens then enters into a million cooperation with Jyske Bank. 5th Just as it is the FACT that Lundgrens will be kicked out on 25 September 2019 for the period 5 February to Lundgrens. At least 30 times have been informed of the allegations. And have been given direct INSTRUCTION, to present the client's fraud allegations against Jyske Bank, without following any of the client's instructions. :-( It should be investigated by the police whether Lundgren's lawyers have been bribed / paid by Jyske Bank A / S And who at Jyske Bank has approved contacting Lundgren's lawyers around March May 2018, to advise Jyske Bank on a transaction for around DKK 600 million. Just as a study on Jyske Bank has given Lundgren's other tasks, and which. Dan Terkildsen from Lundgrens has not wanted to answer the client's questions, about the cooperation between the parties Lundgrens and Jyske Bank. / If Lundgren's lawyers are a reputable law firm. Then the management of Lundgren himself contacts the police and asks them to investigate Lundgrens The suspicion that some of the partners have been dishonest towards their customer / small client .. / This is an invitation to Lundgrens and Jyske Bank. Now ask the police to investigate About Jyske Bank bribing Lundgrens to counteract their client's case against Jyske Bank and the management. To directly contribute to fraud allegations against Jyske Bank has not been presented. Why the Client Himself Has to Present, the 52-page Final Petition, October 28, 2019 When Lundgren's lawyers have been instructed several times to present the client's fraud allegations. / We do not need to ask the management of Jyske Bank to ask the police to investigate Jyske Bank, because the bank has bribed Lundgrens, by using the return commission. Since Jyske Bank has already lied to the court through their board member and lawyer Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager Advokater, already, several places in legal matters. :-) Like Jyske Bank, the customer who is exposed to the bank's long-standing fraud wants an early decision. But Philip Baruch, we were just bombed back to September 25, 2019, after we discovered that Jyske Bank probably bought our lawyer Lundgren's lawyers in April 2018. So it's not conspiracy theories, as Lundgrens thinks it is, but simply one FACT
De stolte Partner i Lundgrens Spørgsmål er om Lundgrens har modtaget bestikkelse af Jyske Bank, i form af retur kommision for millioner.

For those of you who use Lundgren’s lawyers, or are clients in the Danish banks, such as Jyske Bank, you should read here. Notice to you who has shares in Jyske Bank, follow the case. We have, as you may have read, informed the court that we have fired Lundgren’s lawyers in the case against Jyske Bank for fraud. BS 402/2015-VIB A simple and straightforward case, but unfortunately after 44 months has not yet been presented by a lawyer before the court. Please help us and tell us if we have not clearly and clearly told Lundgren’s attorneys to present our fraud allegations to the court. Read letters and smear at www.banknyt.dk ? We are here trying to show and document to you that relying on Lundgrens can be associated with an unnecessary risk that you should not expose yourself to. So before choosing the large Danish law firm Lundgren’s lawyers in the Port of Tuborg So read here how Lundgrens works. Link to text messages can be found on www.banknyt.dk ! We have previously used Dan Terkildsen Partner in Lundgrens, he was in the process of complying with Jyske Bank’s interests, and has withheld the client’s claims and evidence in court. Dan Terkildsen’s partner in Lundgren’s lawyers has therefore been fired, on suspicion that Lundgrens has accepted bribes. The mere suspicion that Jyske Bank Group management, probably the top management, with CEO Anders Christian Dam in the lead, who, through the use of a “return commission”, has in fact bribed Lundgren’s lawyers, not to present the client’s claims against Jyske Bank for a million fraud, is now presented to the court. ! Philip Baruch’s partner in Lund Elmer Sandager Attorneys is taking a sharp distance from the board of Jyske Bank, should have bribed Lundgren’s lawyers. But just read the pictures of text messages between Lundgrens and the client. When reading text messages are between Carsten and Emil, ask yourself? Why does Emi Lundgrensl not respond to the client, and directly against the order, again submits a writ petition outside the client. It feels like Jyske Bank, the bank also works only according to Jyske Bank’s own interests. And then tell if Lundgrens has counteracted their clients’ interests, and instead helped, Jyske Bank towards their own client.



Copyright © Elvagten | 80 20 20 80 | Design zeeland.dk